Notice to Clerk of Court and Public Memorial

NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT AND PUBLIC MEMORIAL

To the Clerk of Court, the Court, and all parties of interest:

Please take notice and enter into the public record the following memorialized statements and objections, made in good faith and without waiver of any rights, remedies, or defenses, all of which are expressly reserved.

I. NOTICE OF DISHONOR AND BREACH OF CONSTITUTIONAL OATH

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned alleges that the presiding judicial officer, Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle is operating in dishonor by failing to uphold and adhere to their constitutional oath of office. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any exercise of judicial power must be consistent with the limits imposed by that oath.

Failure to act within those limits constitutes an ultra vires act and is outside the lawful authority of the office.

II. NOTICE OF MISCHARACTERIZATION OF PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES

Notice is further given that the court has mischaracterized the undersigned’s writ of quo warranto as a mere “request,” when it is, in fact, a lawful petition for redress of grievances, protected as a right of the People.

The right to petition the government for redress of grievances is not a privilege granted by the court, but a right retained by the People. A writ of quo warranto is a lawful demand requiring the respondent to demonstrate by what authority they act, particularly where orders are issued that affect rights, status, or property.

III. NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO MISAPPLICATION OF LEGAL DEFINITIONS

Notice is hereby given that the court is objected to for applying legal definitions and terms of art in a manner that improperly attempts to impute status, capacity, or obligations to the undersigned that do not lawfully apply.

The undersigned objects to any implication that they are an “individual” or legal fiction to whom statutory presumptions automatically attach. Rights do not originate from statutes or from the state; they are retained by We the People, of whom the undersigned is one.

Any attempt to blur this distinction through selective legal definitions is hereby challenged and placed on the record.

IV. DEMAND FOR PROOF OF AUTHORITY (WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO)

The undersigned hereby reiterates and memorializes the demand that the presiding judicial officer demonstrate:

1. By what lawful authority they are issuing orders in this matter;
2. Production of a valid oath of office;
3. Production of any required bond associated with the fiduciary appointment relied upon;
4. Proof that such authority has not been exceeded or abused.

The failure to respond directly to this demand constitutes evidence of a lack of authority and an attempt to divert attention from a material jurisdictional challenge.

V. NOTICE REGARDING UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTS

It is further memorialized for the record that:

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
— Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)

Any order, ruling, or procedure that conflicts with constitutional limitations is void ab initio and without lawful effect.

VI. PRESERVATION OF RECORD

This Notice and Public Memorial is submitted to ensure that the record accurately reflects the objections, demands, and constitutional issues raised herein, and to prevent waiver by silence or acquiescence.

All rights are reserved. No consent is given. No presumption is accepted.